County Risk & Progress View
County-level view showing where implementation momentum is strong, where risk is increasing, and where additional support or funding attention may be needed.
Geographic distribution (concept view)
Concept mapping layer showing how counties can be visually compared for risk, reach, and partner support needs.
TurkanaAt risk
Referral needs and community stress signals are rising. Extra support may be required for partner follow-up.
ManderaWatch
Reporting is strong, but activity intensity has dipped in two areas.
MarsabitOn track
Consistent sessions, strong partner reporting, and improving engagement.
GarissaWatch
Partner cadence is uneven and some referrals are taking longer to close.
HomabayOn track
Stable reporting, active support groups, and strong local coordination.
County comparison table
| County | Girls reached | Sessions | Referrals | Partners flagged | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turkana | 710 | 41 | 11 | 2 | High risk |
| Mandera | 620 | 37 | 7 | 1 | Watch |
| Marsabit | 540 | 33 | 5 | 0 | On track |
| Garissa | 610 | 39 | 8 | 1 | Watch |
| Homabay | 760 | 60 | 7 | 0 | On track |
Review prompts
| Is this the right county lens? |
| Would this support funding decisions? |
| Is the terminology right? |